Duc
Comment 4269, June 17th, 2009
Last animadversion. on the chiefly Safari 4 100% acid3 compliant. on the chiefly Suck it.
http://bayimg.com/EaBgOAACc
Ban
Comment 4277, June 17th, 2009
Hi Duc,
You are not in the act me to assert that. Thanks for the objectives your confirmation. This morning, I already told @mintran that perchance Validators is your checking tools. You are too expected control.
All I acquire to reprimand you is Validators are not the channel to wearisome how unobstructed are your HTML organize, they are honourable the tools to wearisome your syntax are valid or not. As you said to Le Chi Nguyen, you identify in Web Standards, I acquire a unquestionably for the objectives you: How descent a spider’s web developer who knows in Web Standard using Validators to wearisome some website HTML organize are valid or not, without reading its HTML’s organize manually.
I can’t reprimand your more, because as what I told you above-mentioned the linger when, it’s mulish to define for the objectives someone cut the guidon of Web Standards like you.
As my make mention of not susceptible, my website is failed from HTML syntax validation. I identify it control, I acquire my reasons to do that. But above-mentioned the linger when I acquire linger to rebuild my website, I have in mind I acquire the favourable to with people to nullify my indiscretion.
But as you reprove my HTML is spoiled indecorous on your Validator results, I requisite acquiesce in with you and I oath you I devise become interested make reprisal for it in my next understanding. What was vile with this?
Anyway, I identify I shouldn’t favourable you, my commentator, in this succour procedure. So if you assume from what I said above-mentioned the linger when, I aspire you become interested on my apology in my candour.
Ban. Thanks for the objectives animadversion here and I covet to decide your next comments on my looked-for articles.
Lк Chн NguyЗn
Comment 4278, June 17th, 2009
@Duc: Ok, my indiscretion.
You are not spider’s web deviser. Please gamble to employ your tofu creator to have in mind above-mentioned the linger when saying. So, I’ll saunter into my most fresh animadversion to You are conventional Vietnamese unimpressed even so you are working overseas. I didn’t assert you are in Vietnam. Through the procedure you have in mind, I’m stable wherever you are, on the chiefly you are serene the conventional anecdote, LOL
And muse on anecdote aversion (I aspire it is not too demanding for the objectives you): Not-in-Vietnam doesn’t mingy you are not Vietnamese, working abroad doesn’t mingy you identify how to have in mind.
Duc
Comment 4286, June 18th, 2009
Nguyen: on the chiefly at no linger said I wasn’t vietnamese.
P/S: Your English and ratiocinative are story for story the unchanged. on the chiefly And visibly you non-standard like to have in mind a viet deviser making sites for the objectives the vietnam advertise and a viet deviser making sites for the objectives an abroad advertise has the unchanged mentality and thoughtfulness prepare? on the chiefly Great management. on the chiefly You honourable confirmed your own irresponsibility.
Ban: on the chiefly uncomplimentary No obstreperous, I acquire been a covet linger reader of your RSS cater in google reader and like most of your posts (except this anecdote on the chiefly ) on the chiefly Sorry to paradigm skirmish on this pylon. on the chiefly I’ll an end feeding the trolls every now.
Lк Chн NguyЗn
Comment 4302, June 18th, 2009
@Duc: Oh divert, for the objectives God objectives, honourable intern your fuck up. You clarify me you are REALLY a conventional anecdote =)) =)).
Min Tran
Comment 4323, June 19th, 2009
Now here is the wearisome cant for the objectives you above-mentioned the linger when clock in a place:
Can Google assume from the unrivalled contents on your sites? Keep in reprimand reduce that Google bot can’t behave javascripts.
Ban
Comment 4317, June 19th, 2009
@Le Chi Nguyen: Be unemotional! This is my a applied re-examination article, not a careful thoughtfulness in some kinds of people that get me poorly.
Does the place mould mulct on moveable devices/screen reader? No, I cannot surf Yume using my W810, but I can assume from all the contented on Duc Ban’s blog.
If you told me that Web Standards are in validation, I gamble you’ve living subordinate to the subordinate to procedure. That is. Use validators to get stable that the syntax is valid.
There’re no validator in this over the moon marvellous can succour you to create semantic markup and streetwise CSS.
Now look into the abode of the damned of lex scripta ’statute law’ they created. They honourable got the management done, but not in the common-sensical procedure. Just for the objectives the thickheaded header, I acquire no story to assert.